IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Ostrowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1857 0.2012 0.5294 0.5736
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 45 0 3 3 0.067 0.0248 0.0258 0.0706 0.0734
2016-17 Soo Eagles NOJHL 34 7 16 23 0.676 0.1141 0.1110 0.2811 0.2735
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 25 3 5 8 0.320
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 15 1 3 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2017-18 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+267.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15816
Defenseman overall
#2107
Defenseman born in 1997
#5715
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Millin
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Haney
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Flannery
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.