IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Millin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Coquitlam Express BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 55 21 22 43 0.782 0.2259 0.2219 0.5885 0.5780
2012-13 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 54 29 28 57 1.056 0.3050 0.2860 0.7947 0.7451
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 27 14 15 29 1.074
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 28 13 18 31 1.107
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 23 2 7 9 0.391
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2013-14 · St. Scholastica
+57.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12575
Forward overall
#550
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kimball
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Noonan
Southern Maine · 2022-23
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Ratzloff
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.