← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niko Happo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-14 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 37 12 23 35 0.946 0.5127 0.4945 1.4305 1.3797
2016-17 Jokerit U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 47 15 26 41 0.872 0.4728 0.4582 1.3192 1.2783
2017-18 NCDC 46 12 25 37 0.804 0.3279 0.3041 0.6465 0.5996
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 24 7 18 25 1.042
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 UCHC JR 3 0 2 2 0.667
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 3 0 2 2 0.667
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 23 4 29 33 1.435
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 23 4 29 33 1.435
2018-19 Manhattanville D1 UCHC FR 27 4 10 14 0.518
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 27 4 10 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Manhattanville
+65.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6032
Forward overall
#292
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.