IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominik Shine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — USHL 54 15 14 29 0.537 0.3168 0.3472 1.6128 1.7676
2010-11 — USHL 52 12 16 28 0.538 0.3177 0.3321 1.6173 1.6908
2011-12 — USHL 32 11 21 32 1.000 0.5899 0.5892 3.0034 2.9997
2012-13 — USHL 50 26 19 45 0.900 0.5309 0.5020 2.7031 2.5559
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 33 20 10 30 0.909
2015-16 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 34 15 15 30 0.882
2014-15 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 26 7 13 20 0.769
2013-14 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 38 6 11 17 0.447
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2013-14 · Northern Michigan
-10.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5309
Forward overall
#245
Forward born in 1993
#271
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sascha Figi
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.