IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominik Shine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — USHL 54 15 14 29 0.537 0.3420 0.3748 1.6092 1.7636
2010-11 — USHL 52 12 16 28 0.538 0.3429 0.3585 1.6137 1.6870
2011-12 — USHL 32 11 21 32 1.000 0.6368 0.6360 2.9967 2.9930
2012-13 — USHL 50 26 19 45 0.900 0.5731 0.5419 2.6970 2.5502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 33 20 10 30 0.909
2015-16 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 34 15 15 30 0.882
2014-15 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 26 7 13 20 0.769
2013-14 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 38 6 11 17 0.447
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.54
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2013-14 · Northern Michigan
-17.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2074
Forward overall
#90
Forward born in 1993
#269
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dill
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.