IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Biggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 — NTDP-U18 53 16 9 25 0.472 0.3752 0.3832 1.7666 1.8041
2010-11 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 55 19 12 31 0.564 0.4483 0.4387 2.1108 2.0656
2012-13 Oshawa Generals OHL 60 26 27 53 0.883 0.5272 0.4993 2.2879 2.1670
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Miami D1 — FR 37 9 8 17 0.460
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2011-12 · Miami
+28.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3782
Forward overall
#157
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.