Sam Anas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-01 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	Youngstown Phantoms	USHL	51	17	17	34	0.667	0.3933	0.3952	2.0024	2.0119
2012-13	Youngstown Phantoms	USHL	64	37	26	63	0.984	0.5807	0.5526	2.9565	2.8133
2023-24	Dinamo Minsk	KHL	60	21	25	46	0.767	1.9168	1.5271	10.5641	8.4165
2024-25	Dinamo Minsk	KHL	66	19	27	46	0.697	1.7425	1.3368	9.6038	7.3677

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2015-16	Quinnipiac	D1	ECAC	JR	43	24	26	50	1.163
2014-15	Quinnipiac	D1	ECAC	SO	38	23	16	39	1.026
2013-14	Quinnipiac	D1	ECAC	FR	40	22	21	43	1.075

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.42

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.07

2013-14 · Quinnipiac

+156.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#403

Forward overall

#28

Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.