IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Anas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-01 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Dinamo Minsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 51 17 17 34 0.667 0.4246 0.4266 1.9979 2.0074
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 64 37 26 63 0.984 0.6269 0.5965 2.9500 2.8071
2023-24 Dinamo Minsk KHL 60 21 25 46 0.767 — — — —
2024-25 Dinamo Minsk KHL 66 19 27 46 0.697 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 43 24 26 50 1.163
2014-15 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 38 23 16 39 1.026
2013-14 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 40 22 21 43 1.075
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2013-14 · Quinnipiac
+118.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2027
Forward overall
#85
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.