IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 41 27 40 67 1.634 0.2137 0.2118 0.5546 0.5498
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 6 6 12 0.444
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 17 2 1 3 0.176
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 21 2 5 7 0.333
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Babson
+142.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
15%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4978
Forward overall
#199
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Moore
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock King
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathew Rehding
Adrian · 2018-19
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.