IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 51 18 27 45 0.882 0.3276 0.3258 0.9343 0.9293
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 58 21 29 50 0.862 0.3201 0.3023 0.9128 0.8621
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 28 17 23 40 1.429
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 27 11 19 30 1.111
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 27 8 21 29 1.074
2013-14 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 24 9 6 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+134.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8942
Forward overall
#386
Forward born in 1992
#308
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Egan
Babson · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Nowakowski
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.