IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Pryce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-12-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Pickering Panthers OJHL 49 5 6 11 0.225 0.0550 0.0572 0.1546 0.1609
2011-12 Pickering Panthers OJHL 45 7 28 35 0.778 0.1906 0.1899 0.5355 0.5335
2012-13 North York Rangers OJHL 55 22 14 36 0.654 0.1604 0.1518 0.4506 0.4265
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 26 10 10 20 0.769
2015-16 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 26 15 15 30 1.154
2014-15 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 27 6 12 18 0.667
2013-14 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 24 6 15 21 0.875
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2013-14 · Buffalo State
+511.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31797
Forward overall
#1196
Forward born in 1992
#1728
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Russell
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Roeper
Lawrence · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Remers
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.