← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reid Russell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Collingwood Blues OJHL 35 0 4 4 0.114 0.0319 0.0333 0.0789 0.0824
2015-16 Collingwood Blues OJHL 47 2 19 21 0.447 0.1248 0.1234 0.3083 0.3049
2016-17 Collingwood Blues OJHL 54 10 36 46 0.852 0.2380 0.2247 0.5879 0.5551
2017-18 Collingwood Blues OJHL 51 6 28 34 0.667 0.1863 0.1669 0.4601 0.4123
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 22 6 12 18 0.818
2020-21 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 26 6 11 17 0.654
2018-19 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 26 3 10 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Skidmore
+178.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4634
Defenseman overall
#913
Defenseman born in 1997
#1686
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.