IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Remers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 43 16 17 33 0.767 0.1647 0.1692 0.3758 0.3860
2015-16 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 40 11 11 22 0.550 0.2042 0.1986 0.5823 0.5663
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 26 13 14 27 1.038
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 25 7 12 19 0.760
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 25 8 15 23 0.920
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 23 9 9 18 0.783
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2016-17 · Buffalo State
+389.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21776
Forward overall
#863
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Gooch
Neumann · 2002-03
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.