← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cassidy Bowes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Penticton Vees BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 49 16 17 33 0.673 0.2595 0.2636 0.9801 0.9956
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 46 7 17 24 0.522 0.2010 0.1933 0.7592 0.7303
2019-20 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 45 23 23 46 1.022 0.3428 0.3428 0.9459 0.9459
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE 26 9 5 14 0.538
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE 20 11 9 20 1.000
2021-22 UConn D1 HockeyEast 11 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 11 1 2 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2020-21 · UConn
+43.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18835
Forward overall
#918
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.