IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Soik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Brooks Bandits AJHL 48 16 19 35 0.729 0.2446 0.2404 0.6748 0.6631
2006-07 Brooks Bandits AJHL 59 12 24 36 0.610 0.2047 0.1917 0.5647 0.5289
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 27 10 14 24 0.889
2009-10 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 26 14 11 25 0.962
2008-09 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 17 7 9 16 0.941
2007-08 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 26 20 15 35 1.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.35
2007-08 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+644.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25694
Forward overall
#867
Forward born in 1986
#725
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Fackey
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake McKenelly
Wentworth · 2017-18
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Andrews
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.