IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Harroun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Timmins Rock NOJHL 57 50 46 96 1.684 0.2813 0.2614 0.7011 0.6516
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 10 2 2 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · Norwich
+78.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9245
Forward overall
#446
Forward born in 2002
#10
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kullan Daikawa
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Henri Spoof
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.