IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Perry Gaudreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 24 3 3 6 0.250 0.0495 0.0495 0.1139 0.1139
2022-23 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 30 11 9 20 0.667 0.1321 0.1321 0.3037 0.3037
2023-24 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 44 25 15 40 0.909 0.2100 0.2165 0.4448 0.4585
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Suffolk D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25258
Forward overall
#1423
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rocco Andreacchi
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Hogg
Concordia · 2013-14
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.