IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Reuschlein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 58 17 24 41 0.707 0.2597 0.2731 0.7461 0.7846
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 59 16 31 47 0.797 0.2927 0.2931 0.8408 0.8419
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Army D1 AHA SR 36 4 8 12 0.333
2015-16 Army D1 AHA JR 35 6 7 13 0.371
2014-15 Army D1 AHA SO 32 9 6 15 0.469
2013-14 Army D1 AHA FR 33 11 11 22 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2013-14 · Army
+173.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15570
Forward overall
#554
Forward born in 1993
#773
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andréas Fleutot
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Humphrey
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Thie
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.