IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Reuschlein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 58 17 24 41 0.707 0.2625 0.2760 0.7485 0.7871
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 59 16 31 47 0.797 0.2958 0.2962 0.8434 0.8445
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Army D1 AHA SR 36 4 8 12 0.333
2015-16 Army D1 AHA JR 35 6 7 13 0.371
2014-15 Army D1 AHA SO 32 9 6 15 0.469
2013-14 Army D1 AHA FR 33 11 11 22 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2013-14 · Army
+170.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11829
Forward overall
#433
Forward born in 1993
#651
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Sieckhaus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Mayer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Humphrey
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Thie
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Fink
Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.