← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Humphrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Brewster NE-Prep 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0403 0.0403 0.0915 0.0915
2021-22 Brewster NE-Prep 28 5 4 9 0.321 0.0648 0.0648 0.1471 0.1471
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 17 9 9 18 1.059 0.1270 0.1210 0.2431 0.2317
2023-24 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 47 5 2 7 0.149 0.0553 0.0532 0.1577 0.1516
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 27 9 8 17 0.630
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 19 8 7 15 0.789
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2024-25 · SUNY Cortland
+1047.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43408
Forward overall
#2298
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.