← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Humphrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Brewster NE-Prep 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0396 0.0396 0.0911 0.0911
2021-22 Brewster NE-Prep 28 5 4 9 0.321 0.0637 0.0637 0.1464 0.1464
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 17 9 9 18 1.059 0.0977 0.0931 0.2425 0.2311
2023-24 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 47 5 2 7 0.149 0.0547 0.0526 0.1572 0.1511
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 27 9 8 17 0.630
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 19 8 7 15 0.789
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2024-25 · SUNY Cortland
+1240.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40159
Forward overall
#2519
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tufts · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.