IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Puglisi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Brockville Braves CCHL 60 5 23 28 0.467 0.1332 0.1308 0.3613 0.3547
2008-09 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 6 30 36 0.610 0.1742 0.1608 0.4724 0.4361
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 27 1 6 7 0.259
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 28 0 11 11 0.393
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 28 1 6 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2009-10 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+77.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6571
Defenseman overall
#1067
Defenseman born in 1988
#883
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Gauld
Canton · 2017-18
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyllian Kirkwood
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Valure
Concordia Wisconsin · 2018-19
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.