IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Puglisi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Brockville Braves CCHL 60 5 23 28 0.467 0.1012 0.0994 0.3611 0.3545
2008-09 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 6 30 36 0.610 0.1324 0.1222 0.4721 0.4358
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 27 1 6 7 0.259
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 28 0 11 11 0.393
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 28 1 6 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2009-10 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+134.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8502
Defenseman overall
#1091
Defenseman born in 1988
#729
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Gauld
Canton · 2017-18
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Camille Marcoux
Western New England · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyllian Kirkwood
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.