← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max McHugh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 20 5 13 18 0.900 0.3342 0.3679 0.9529 1.0489
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 53 12 23 35 0.660 0.2452 0.2578 0.6992 0.7352
2012-13 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 59 24 28 52 0.881 0.3273 0.3277 0.9332 0.9343
2013-14 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 21 13 34 0.567 0.3609 0.3305 1.6982 1.5551
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SR 11 3 3 6 0.545
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 JR 33 8 11 19 0.576
2015-16 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SO 34 7 15 22 0.647
2014-15 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 38 12 11 23 0.605
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2014-15 · Alabama-Huntsville
+114.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8902
Forward overall
#333
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.