IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conlan Keenan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 16 34 50 1.111 0.3337 0.3396 0.9152 0.9315
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 24 29 53 1.204 0.3617 0.3504 0.9921 0.9611
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 27 22 28 50 1.852
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 27 23 25 48 1.778
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 29 18 21 39 1.345
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 27 23 12 35 1.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.30
2016-17 · SUNY Geneseo
+337.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7467
Forward overall
#261
Forward born in 1995
#14
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Gibson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.