← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alessio Luciani Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Markham Royals OJHL 30 13 19 32 1.067 0.2614 0.2549 0.7344 0.7162
2018-19 Markham Royals OJHL 54 31 45 76 1.407 0.3450 0.3195 0.9690 0.8975
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 25 13 24 37 1.480
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 30 17 31 48 1.600
2020-21 Adrian D1 NCHA SO 23 14 22 36 1.565
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 23 14 22 36 1.565
2019-20 Adrian D1 NCHA FR 29 10 22 32 1.103
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 29 10 22 32 1.103
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.10
2019-20 · Adrian
+338.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14892
Forward overall
#684
Forward born in 1998
#456
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.