IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coby Downs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 57 27 46 73 1.281 0.3700 0.3720 0.9641 0.9692
2016-17 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1274 0.1178 0.5993 0.5544
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 26 10 18 28 1.077
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 29 9 20 29 1.000
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 25 11 14 25 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2017-18 · Norwich
+432.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4748
Forward overall
#182
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Leo Bacallao
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Spink
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.