IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coby Downs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 57 27 46 73 1.281 0.3281 0.3298 0.9654 0.9705
2016-17 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1092 0.6007 0.5557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D1 LittleEast JR 26 10 18 28 1.077
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 26 10 18 28 1.077
2018-19 Norwich D1 LittleEast SO 29 9 20 29 1.000
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 29 9 20 29 1.000
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 25 11 14 25 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2017-18 · Norwich
+491.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7596
Forward overall
#342
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Skelly
New England College · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Fahlstedt
Salem State · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Groth
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.