← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Boswell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 21 1 5 6 0.286 0.0727 0.0727 0.1185 0.1185
2021-22 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 45 16 14 30 0.667 0.1695 0.1837 0.2766 0.2998
2022-23 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 35 10 16 26 0.743 0.1889 0.1967 0.3082 0.3209
2023-24 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 50 21 37 58 1.160 0.2950 0.2917 0.4813 0.4759
2024-25 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 50 15 38 53 1.060 0.2696 0.2539 0.4398 0.4142
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE FR 15 0 3 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Nichols
-13.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21717
Forward overall
#1180
Forward born in 2004
#184
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2016-17
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.