IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Tang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-27 Country: Hong Kong
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Middlesex NE-Prep 27 18 28 46 1.704 0.3375 0.3375 0.7762 0.7762
2024-25 — NCDC 37 10 17 27 0.730 0.2975 0.2888 0.5865 0.5694
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 21 7 5 12 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2025-26 · Skidmore
+116.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6800
Forward overall
#230
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dante Zapata
Utica · 2018-19
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tucker Coborn
Concordia · 2011-12
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Harguindeguy
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.