| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Fargo Force | USHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Johnstown Tomahawks | NAHL | 48 | 3 | 20 | 23 | 0.479 | 0.1779 | 0.1824 | 0.5074 | 0.5202 |
| 2015-16 | — | NAHL | 57 | 3 | 15 | 18 | 0.316 | 0.1173 | 0.1151 | 0.3344 | 0.3280 |
| 2016-17 | Coulee Region Chill | NAHL | 59 | 11 | 38 | 49 | 0.831 | 0.3084 | 0.2858 | 0.8793 | 0.8148 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SR | 9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.778 |
| 2019-20 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | JR | 28 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.679 |
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SO | 31 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.613 |
| 2017-18 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | FR | 26 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.577 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.