← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Quagliata Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Fargo Force USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 48 3 20 23 0.479 0.1779 0.1824 0.5074 0.5202
2015-16 NAHL 57 3 15 18 0.316 0.1173 0.1151 0.3344 0.3280
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 59 11 38 49 0.831 0.3084 0.2858 0.8793 0.8148
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 9 2 5 7 0.778
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 28 11 8 19 0.679
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 31 9 10 19 0.613
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 26 4 11 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+181.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3408
Defenseman overall
#739
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.