IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Georgi Gorodetsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-28 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 57 7 27 34 0.597 0.3519 0.3331 1.7574 1.6637
2015-16 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 55 8 24 32 0.582 0.3432 0.3090 1.7141 1.5431
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wentworth D3 CNE — 28 15 20 35 1.250
2018-19 Wentworth D3 CNE — 24 16 14 30 1.250
2017-18 Wentworth D3 CNE — 24 9 8 17 0.708
2016-17 Arizona State D1 — — 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Arizona State
-0.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10914
Forward overall
#453
Forward born in 1995
#1031
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2002-03
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alessio Luciani
Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.