← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Magagna Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Wellington Dukes OJHL 36 11 12 23 0.639 0.1785 0.1902 0.4409 0.4698
2001-02 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 14 36 50 1.042 0.2911 0.2952 0.7189 0.7289
2002-03 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 10 41 51 1.062 0.2969 0.2888 0.7332 0.7131
2003-04 Wellington Dukes OJHL 44 19 40 59 1.341 0.3746 0.3475 0.9254 0.8583
2004-05 Wellington Dukes OJHL 46 26 51 77 1.674 0.4677 0.4102 1.1552 1.0132
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SR 26 7 8 15 0.577
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 24 12 20 32 1.333
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 28 11 24 35 1.250
2005-06 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 27 12 13 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2005-06 · SUNY Oswego
+180.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5362
Forward overall
#174
Forward born in 1984
#100
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.