← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-01-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Collingwood Blues OJHL 43 7 9 16 0.372 0.1040 0.1068 0.2568 0.2638
2004-05 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 24 27 51 1.062 0.2969 0.2900 0.7332 0.7161
2005-06 OJHL 51 26 44 70 1.373 0.3835 0.3604 0.9472 0.8902
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 SR 31 15 16 31 1.000
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 JR 27 10 10 20 0.741
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 SO 32 11 17 28 0.875
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 FR 21 1 5 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2006-07 · St. Norbert
0.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11023
Forward overall
#436
Forward born in 1986
#538
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.