IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-01-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Collingwood Blues OJHL 43 7 9 16 0.372 0.0912 0.0937 0.2562 0.2631
2004-05 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 24 27 51 1.062 0.2604 0.2543 0.7315 0.7144
2005-06 — OJHL 51 26 44 70 1.373 0.3364 0.3161 0.9450 0.8881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 15 16 31 1.000
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 10 10 20 0.741
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 32 11 17 28 0.875
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 21 1 5 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2006-07 · St. Norbert
+14.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14885
Forward overall
#517
Forward born in 1986
#455
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Kudynski
Lebanon Valley · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.