IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Kudynski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Trenton Sting OJHL 41 10 10 20 0.488 0.1363 0.1388 0.3366 0.3428
2002-03 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 15 2 2 4 0.267 0.1038 0.1046 0.3889 0.3919
2003-04 Port Hope Predators OJHL 42 11 30 41 0.976 0.2728 0.2543 0.6737 0.6279
2004-05 Aurora Tigers OJHL 20 5 4 9 0.450 0.1257 0.1108 0.3105 0.2737
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Lebanon Valley D3 — FR 11 2 8 10 0.909
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2004-05 · Lebanon Valley
+446.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24783
Forward overall
#838
Forward born in 1984
#2066
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Muchalla
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Monfredo
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Merritt
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.