IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Kudynski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Trenton Sting OJHL 41 10 10 20 0.488 0.1196 0.1218 0.3359 0.3421
2002-03 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 15 2 2 4 0.267 0.1028 0.1036 0.3881 0.3911
2003-04 Port Hope Predators OJHL 42 11 30 41 0.976 0.2393 0.2230 0.6721 0.6265
2004-05 Aurora Tigers OJHL 20 5 4 9 0.450 0.1103 0.0972 0.3098 0.2731
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 11 2 8 10 0.909
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2004-05 · Lebanon Valley
+506.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32072
Forward overall
#924
Forward born in 1984
#1759
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Muchalla
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Chickering
University of New England · 2021-22
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Monfredo
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.