IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Langworthy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mankato West High USHS-MN 25 31 19 50 2.000 0.2532 0.2388 0.4858 0.4582
2015-16 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 46 13 21 34 0.739 0.0928 0.0940 0.2333 0.2362
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 42 23 18 41 0.976 0.1225 0.1179 0.3082 0.2965
2017-18 — NA3HL 48 29 31 60 1.250 0.1569 0.1430 0.3946 0.3596
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Bethel D1 MIAC FR 20 4 4 8 0.400
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC — 20 4 4 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2018-19 · Bethel
+251.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22610
Forward overall
#1032
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Powers
Middlebury · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Haxton
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Boyce
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.