IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Ayers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — CCHL 53 11 16 27 0.509 0.1454 0.1406 0.3943 0.3814
2007-08 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 24 34 58 0.983 0.2806 0.2580 0.7610 0.6996
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 17 3 14 17 1.000
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 19 8 6 14 0.737
2009-10 Castleton D3 — SO 22 2 6 8 0.364
2008-09 Castleton D3 — FR 14 7 1 8 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2008-09 · Castleton
+216.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17230
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 1987
#478
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sgarbossa
Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.