← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Ayers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 CCHL 53 11 16 27 0.509 0.1105 0.1069 0.3941 0.3812
2007-08 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 24 34 58 0.983 0.2132 0.1960 0.7606 0.6992
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 17 3 14 17 1.000
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 19 8 6 14 0.737
2009-10 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 22 2 6 8 0.364
2008-09 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 14 7 1 8 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2008-09 · Castleton
+316.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21232
Forward overall
#703
Forward born in 1987
#396
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.