IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braydon Beahm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minot Minotauros NAHL 50 14 10 24 0.480 0.1764 0.1950 0.5066 0.5599
2022-23 Omaha Lancers USHL 34 2 3 5 0.147 0.0868 0.0879 0.4418 0.4473
2023-24 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 56 14 25 39 0.696 0.2559 0.2580 0.7351 0.7412
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 57 33 36 69 1.210 0.4447 0.4251 1.2777 1.2213
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 17 13 30 0.968
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2025-26 · St. Norbert
+215.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13474
Forward overall
#619
Forward born in 2004
#539
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dante Spagnuolo
Adrian · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Enns
Marian · 2018-19
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Santopaolo
Aurora · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.