IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Murfitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-04-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — CCHL 49 11 18 29 0.592 0.1689 0.1757 0.4581 0.4767
2001-02 Navan Grads CCHL 51 16 43 59 1.157 0.3302 0.3282 0.8956 0.8903
2002-03 Navan Grads CCHL 49 17 55 72 1.469 0.4194 0.3976 1.1375 1.0785
2003-04 Navan Grads CCHL 46 16 35 51 1.109 0.3164 0.2841 0.8582 0.7707
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 — SR 28 10 21 31 1.107
2006-07 Manhattanville D3 — JR 27 18 13 31 1.148
2005-06 Manhattanville D3 — SO 27 16 27 43 1.593
2004-05 Manhattanville D3 — FR 24 9 12 21 0.875
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2004-05 · Manhattanville
+210.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7362
Forward overall
#291
Forward born in 1983
#85
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.