IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Dreger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 — MJHL 31 4 4 8 0.258 0.0497 0.0511 0.1628 0.1673
2008-09 Dauphin Kings MJHL 58 26 33 59 1.017 0.1958 0.1916 0.6414 0.6276
2009-10 Dauphin Kings MJHL 61 53 46 99 1.623 0.3124 0.2917 1.0235 0.9557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC — 11 5 2 7 0.636
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC — 20 3 7 10 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2010-11 · Neumann
+132.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15687
Forward overall
#542
Forward born in 1989
#97
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cooper Board
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Belger
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.