← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefano Alonzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 51 11 19 30 0.588 0.1643 0.1757 0.4059 0.4342
2013-14 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 53 11 9 20 0.377 0.1054 0.1074 0.2604 0.2652
2014-15 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 53 21 21 42 0.792 0.2214 0.2141 0.5469 0.5288
2015-16 OJHL 48 16 26 42 0.875 0.2445 0.2229 0.6038 0.5505
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SR 21 3 5 8 0.381
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 JR 21 4 5 9 0.429
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SO 23 3 0 3 0.130
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 FR 25 5 12 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2016-17 · SUNY Cortland
+262.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19485
Forward overall
#757
Forward born in 1995
#1429
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Northland · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.