| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Neepawa Titans | MJHL | 42 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.286 | 0.0808 | 0.0879 | 0.1800 | 0.1958 |
| 2015-16 | Neepawa Titans | MJHL | 56 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 0.554 | 0.1566 | 0.1621 | 0.3488 | 0.3611 |
| 2016-17 | Neepawa Titans | MJHL | 48 | 8 | 26 | 34 | 0.708 | 0.2004 | 0.1977 | 0.4463 | 0.4402 |
| 2017-18 | Neepawa Titans | MJHL | 60 | 16 | 52 | 68 | 1.133 | 0.3206 | 0.3007 | 0.7141 | 0.6697 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | BigTen | JR | 10 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.700 |
| 2019-20 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | BigTen | SO | 29 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 0.483 |
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | BigTen | FR | 25 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.480 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.