IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Chakeen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Chicago Steel USHL 56 13 9 22 0.393 0.2502 0.2673 1.1774 1.2579
2007-08 Chicago Steel USHL 53 13 11 24 0.453 0.2883 0.2932 1.3569 1.3801
2008-09 Lincoln Stars USHL 45 8 13 21 0.467 0.2972 0.2890 1.3986 1.3600
2009-10 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 59 30 30 60 1.017 0.3958 0.3686 1.4829 1.3809
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 UMass Boston D3 — FR 26 9 5 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2011-12 · UMass Boston
+86.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8000
Forward overall
#322
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Covelli
Colby · 2004-05
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.