| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Portland Jr. Pirates | USPHL-Premier-Classic | 48 | 16 | 36 | 52 | 1.083 | 0.3041 | 0.2907 | 0.8907 | 0.8514 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | University of New England | D1 | CNE | SR | 30 | 13 | 35 | 48 | 1.600 |
| 2018-19 | University of New England | D3 | CNE | SR | 30 | 13 | 35 | 48 | 1.600 |
| 2017-18 | University of New England | D3 | CNE | JR | 27 | 16 | 35 | 51 | 1.889 |
| 2016-17 | University of New England | D3 | CNE | SO | 26 | 18 | 35 | 53 | 2.038 |
| 2015-16 | University of New England | D3 | CNE | FR | 27 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 1.074 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.