IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-02-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 54 22 23 45 0.833 0.2135 0.2191 0.6281 0.6446
2005-06 — SJHL 55 26 26 52 0.946 0.2422 0.2372 0.7127 0.6979
2006-07 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 58 28 49 77 1.328 0.3401 0.3151 1.0007 0.9271
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 31 11 20 31 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2010-11 · Norwich
+311.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13369
Forward overall
#479
Forward born in 1986
#79
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Broughman
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.