IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beau Orser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Huntsville Otters OJHL 41 2 6 8 0.195 0.0545 0.0606 0.1346 0.1498
2009-10 Huntsville Otters OJHL 55 4 13 17 0.309 0.0864 0.0916 0.2133 0.2262
2010-11 Surrey Eagles BCHL 35 3 1 4 0.114 0.0445 0.0458 0.1667 0.1717
2011-12 Surrey Eagles BCHL 51 0 10 10 0.196 0.0763 0.0744 0.2860 0.2789
2012-13 — BCHL 29 1 7 8 0.276 0.1074 0.0997 0.4023 0.3734
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 7 0 5 5 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+744.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8456
Defenseman overall
#1299
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bulach
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Schulte
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Colley
Marian · 2017-18
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.