← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beau Orser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-18 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Laurentian Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Huntsville Otters OJHL 41 2 6 8 0.195 0.0478 0.0532 0.1343 0.1495
2009-10 Huntsville Otters OJHL 55 4 13 17 0.309 0.0758 0.0804 0.2128 0.2256
2010-11 Surrey Eagles BCHL 35 3 1 4 0.114 0.0440 0.0453 0.1663 0.1713
2011-12 Surrey Eagles BCHL 51 0 10 10 0.196 0.0756 0.0737 0.2854 0.2784
2012-13 BCHL 29 1 7 8 0.276 0.1063 0.0987 0.4015 0.3726
2014-15 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.1439 0.1472 0.7993 0.8177
2015-16 Laurentian Univ. USports-M 15 1 0 1 0.067 0.0352 0.0343 0.1955 0.1904
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 7 0 5 5 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+753.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19155
Defenseman overall
#1902
Defenseman born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2009-10
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.