← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Donnelly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-30 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Nipissing Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 48 4 5 9 0.188 0.0460 0.0487 0.1291 0.1367
2013-14 QMJHL 39 3 3 6 0.154 0.0756 0.0752 0.4107 0.4086
2017-18 Nipissing Univ. USports-M 27 3 11 14 0.518 0.2736 0.2786 1.5197 1.5473
2018-19 Nipissing Univ. USports-M 22 4 7 11 0.500 0.2638 0.2548 1.4655 1.4156
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 2 3 0 3 1.500
2020-21 Concordia (MN) D1 SR 2 3 0 3 1.500
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2019-20 Concordia (MN) D1 JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 2 3 5 0.200
2018-19 Concordia (MN) D1 SO 25 2 3 5 0.200
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5250
Defenseman overall
#899
Defenseman born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
1.556 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.