IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Blair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-01-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 34 3 7 10 0.294 0.0850 0.0867 0.2214 0.2259
2005-06 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 45 6 11 17 0.378 0.1091 0.1062 0.2844 0.2769
2006-07 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 54 5 11 16 0.296 0.0856 0.0788 0.2231 0.2054
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Marian D3 — FR 24 6 11 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2007-08 · Marian
+736.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13281
Defenseman overall
#1421
Defenseman born in 1986
#1729
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Magill-Diaz
Curry · 2017-18
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Lambright
Williams · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Kovar
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.