IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Gobel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 23 6 5 11 0.478 0.0441 0.0459 0.1095 0.1141
2022-23 New York Apple Core EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 New York Apple Core EHL 41 3 8 11 0.268 0.0620 0.0630 0.1313 0.1333
2024-25 New York Apple Core EHL 46 23 26 49 1.065 0.2461 0.2372 0.5212 0.5024
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 LittleEast FR 25 6 9 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2025-26 · Western Connecticut
+318.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24497
Forward overall
#1370
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joonas Linnavuori
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Savva Smirnov
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Fuss
University of New England · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.