IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Stuermer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Nepean Raiders CCHL 33 2 6 8 0.242 0.0526 0.0507 0.1876 0.1810
2011-12 Nepean Raiders CCHL 28 7 6 13 0.464 0.1007 0.0920 0.3594 0.3283
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 18 18 36 1.385
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 27 12 15 27 1.000
2014-15 Concordia (WI) D3 — GR 27 12 15 27 1.000
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 12 13 25 0.926
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 — SR 27 12 13 25 0.926
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 24 9 8 17 0.708
2012-13 Concordia (WI) D3 — JR 24 9 8 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2012-13 · Concordia
+996.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42576
Forward overall
#1506
Forward born in 1991
#1196
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Jestadt
Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Don Rankin
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.