IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Payne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Soo Eagles NOJHL 50 25 46 71 1.420 0.2371 0.2336 0.5911 0.5824
2011-12 Soo Eagles NOJHL 48 19 41 60 1.250 0.2088 0.1946 0.5204 0.4851
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC — 25 11 8 19 0.760
2014-15 Bethel D3 MIAC — 19 6 11 17 0.895
2013-14 Bethel D3 MIAC — 23 10 9 19 0.826
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2012-13 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA — 19 2 3 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2012-13 · Concordia
+46.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14892
Forward overall
#575
Forward born in 1991
#62
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Isley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Roberts
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hendrickson
Concordia · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.