IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Gibbons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 East Coast Wizards EHL 37 1 3 4 0.108 0.0158 0.0162 0.0530 0.0544
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28232
Defenseman overall
#4229
Defenseman born in 2003
#3140
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Politoski
Marian · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Kesler
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Warneke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.