Mark Olver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-01 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2005-06	Omaha Lancers	USHL	59	5	20	25	0.424	0.2604	0.2715	1.2483	1.3015
2006-07	Omaha Lancers	USHL	57	29	35	64	1.123	0.6902	0.6841	3.3080	3.2788
2014-15	HK Sochi	KHL	1	0	1	1	1.000	2.5000	2.5564	—	—
2017-18	Eisbären Berlin	DEL	51	14	19	33	0.647	0.7077	0.6979	—	—
2018-19	Eisbären Berlin	DEL	9	0	1	1	0.111	0.1215	0.1088	—	—
2019-20	Eisbären Berlin	DEL	45	14	19	33	0.733	0.8019	0.8019	—	—
2020-21	Eisbären Berlin	DEL	33	3	17	20	0.606	0.6628	0.6628	—	—
2021-22	Kölner Haie	DEL	42	7	13	20	0.476	0.5208	0.3729	—	—
2022-23	Kölner Haie	DEL	44	8	14	22	0.500	0.5468	0.3754	—	—
2023-24	Kölner Haie	DEL	22	1	2	3	0.136	0.1492	0.0948	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2009-10	Northern Michigan	D1	—	JR	40	19	30	49	1.225
2008-09	Northern Michigan	D1	—	SO	40	16	19	35	0.875
2007-08	Northern Michigan	D1	—	FR	39	21	17	38	0.974

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.48

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.97

2007-08 · Northern Michigan

+101.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

90%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11008

Forward overall

#431

Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Filimon Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.