← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Camper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-06 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
IK Oskarshamn · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Cleveland Barons NAHL 54 14 23 37 0.685 0.2517 0.2852 0.7232 0.8196
2005-06 Cleveland Barons NAHL 57 31 51 82 1.439 0.5285 0.5727 9.3285 9.1630
2006-07 Lincoln Stars USHL 56 23 48 71 1.268 0.7479 0.7604 3.8080 3.8718
2020-21 Leksands IF SHL 46 14 32 46 1.000 2.5000 2.5000 13.0486 13.0486
2021-22 Leksands IF SHL 50 11 37 48 0.960 2.4000 1.5879 12.5267 8.2877
2022-23 Leksands IF SHL 41 13 14 27 0.658 1.6462 1.0503 8.5925 5.4822
2023-24 Tappara Liiga 60 17 31 48 0.800 2.0000 1.0930 6.8769 3.7581
2024-25 IK Oskarshamn Allsvenskan 35 4 15 19 0.543 1.3573 0.6786 5.0934 2.5467
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SR 39 19 38 57 1.462
2009-10 Miami D1 NCHC JR 44 15 28 43 0.977
2008-09 Miami D1 NCHC SO 40 20 22 42 1.050
2007-08 Miami D1 NCHC FR 33 15 26 41 1.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.64
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.24
2007-08 · Miami
+94.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#332
Forward overall
#8
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.