← New Search ↗ Social Card

Megan Goodreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 6 3 9 0.375 0.0566 0.0600
2019-20 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 13 8 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268
2020-21 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 20 26 19 45 2.250 0.3397 0.3397
2021-22 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 28 24 23 47 1.679 0.2535 0.2331
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 31 37 40 77 2.484
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 30 23 24 47 1.567
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 SO 31 17 30 47 1.516
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 FR 29 19 16 35 1.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2022-23 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+760.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2543
Forward overall
#106
Forward born in 2004
#261
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota State ·
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.658 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.