Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.263 | 0.0397 | 0.0397 |
| 2021-22 | Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.960 | 0.1450 | 0.1450 |
| 2022-23 | Roseville/Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 0.846 | 0.1278 | 0.1224 |
| 2023-24 | Roseville/Mahtomedi High | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 1.154 | 0.1742 | 0.1595 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | SO | 25 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.480 |
| 2024-25 | St. Scholastica | NCHA | FR | 25 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.480 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annie Roche | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG | 0.000 | Colgate |
| Grace Zumwinkle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 1.000 | Minnesota |
| Jordan Chancellor | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.517 | Yale |
| Jessica Bonfe | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG | 0.206 | Merrimack |
| Paetyn Levis | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG | 0.176 | Ohio State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lily McKenzie | 2024-25 · 1.81 PPG | 0.210 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Tala Gallaga | 2010-11 · 1.00 PPG | — | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Sophie Smith | 2024-25 · 1.04 PPG | 0.393 | Lake Forest | NCHA |
| Cara Cook | 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG | 0.333 | Aurora | NCHA |
| Renee Ng | 2023-24 · 0.38 PPG | 1.042 | Wilkes | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.